RSS

Dresden Files?

Display mode:
Don Ricci 7 months ago

Dresden Files?

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

Because you know, I love them. They are my favourite books, and Jim Butcher is god in my eyes. Okay not really, but they're brilliant. Y/Y?

lolalinda
101151 words so far Winner!

yep, really brilliant... I just love Harry ;)

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

Yes! I was actually just about to start this thread...

The best bit's gotta be with the gruffs and the doughnut. Or the bit in Fool Moon where he jumps out of a car.

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

My favourite will always be in Dead Beat when he reanimates Sue, but those parts are quite definitely awesome and I love them.

DreadPirateRobyn
3270 words so far

YES! So far, Sue has been the highlight of the series, IMHO. :-)

ZNZ 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

ZNZ
50034 words so far Winner!

These are good, then? I've heard a lot about them, and I was thinking of seeking them out...

Southwick
13094 words so far

You definitely should when you get the chance.

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

They're definitely a good read.

Southwick
13094 words so far

I LOVE this series! The humor is great and I always end up feeling so badly for Harry.

Has anyone finished the most recent book?

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

I've finished it! I actually got it when it came out and had Jim Butcher sign my book and saw him talk and got a picture with him and stuff, so uh, yeah. *raises hand*

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

I'm trying to. I'm really not in a reading mood at the moment but I'm working my way through it -- I am enjoying it a lot (and I kind of peeked at the ending. HA! I WAS RIGHT!!! That's exactly what I thought would happen)

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

Does anyone follow the (apparently already infamous) Tumblr Dresden Files ask group?

sirgimpofbaath
50243 words so far Winner!

I'm actually in the middle of plowing my way through the series-- just finished Proven Guilty. Really, really good books.

But as much as I like the Dresden Files, I think Butcher's Codex Alera is even better. That series gave him more of a chance to stretch his characterization and worldbuilding muscles, I think.

DreadPirateRobyn
3270 words so far

I have yet to read Codex Alera. It's on my (very long) list of stuff-to-be-read, though. :-)

As for the most recent Dresden Files book (no spoilers here)... I think it was the weakest in the series. The plot felt forced to me, and it took me much longer to finish than the others did. I'm still definitely a fan, though, and I hope I like the next one better.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

Yeah, the latest one isn't my favourite but it still has its moments. Codex Alera is fantastic as well. Has anyone else here got into the large argument with other people you know who've read it, because you all pronounce 'Tavi' differently?

arrowsforpens

More Dresden Files, all the time!

I know the latest one wasn't as intense as the others but... if it followed the pattern and topped Changes, I don't think I would have been able to keep breathing. xD I needed the breather 'episode.' It still had me laughing and sobbing. Basically, Jim Butcher Is My Master Now.

Just read Codex Alera a few weeks back and loved it to little bits :) None of my real-life friends have read those, so I haven't had anyone to argue over Tavi's name with. >.>

FlameRaven
51589 words so far Winner!

I got to the ninth book, I think, before I just couldn't read any more. I don't know. I liked the early books when it was very much film-noir detective stuff with bonus supernatural shenanigans, although I never really liked Harry as a character. Mostly because he is just. so. dumb. I don't like dumb characters, and his continuous "I will be chivalrous even if it gets me killed" schtick was really annoying. :/ When Harry was down on his luck and dealing with small-scale things, though, that was cool. Once it spread out into this massive world-wide vampires vs. wizards war I just... didn't really care anymore. I don't like the wizard's council, and I really really don't care about vampires. In fact I skipped an entire book (the one with the necromancer?) because I read the back and was like "what? more vampires? screw this."

I've been spoiled via TVTropes for most of the stuff that goes down in the last couple books, especially Changes, and.... yeah, I don't think I can bring myself to continue. There's torturing a character for plot, and then there's going too far. Changes seems to me like it goes too far.

I'm not really confident in Butcher's ability to write women, or I would wish for a series of books told from Murphy's perspective, because she's awesome. The world needs more badass lady cops solving crime.

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

Can I question? Why the (expletive) did you even read them then? I mean if you hate everything they're about...

Don Ricci
50068 words so far Winner!

I actually am curious, I just couldn't communicate my high level of confusion without using at least one expletive.

FlameRaven
51589 words so far Winner!

I don't hate everything they're about. Let me explain better.

I read them because a friend of mine adores the series and recommended them. I was also interested in the books because I knew they were set in Chicago and I grew up very close to that city-- I always like to see more portrayals of Chicago in fiction because most of the time New York gets all the attention.

The first few books were VERY readable and well-done; Jim Butcher does know how to write a clever plot and I thought he handled the mysteries very well. Harry as a character was sort of 'meh' for me and occasionally annoying, but there were enough awesome side characters that this was not so much of a flaw.

However...after about book 5 the series started to change focus from small-time detective work to this huge world-spanning magic war. That's fine I guess, but... it really didn't keep my interest as much, and I thought that Butcher was discarding a lot of the things he did well to pursue that second focus. As the plot kept getting bigger, the flaws in Harry's character got more and more obvious-- mostly, his tendency to rush in with no plan and/or walk into traps to save the ladies. These flaws were okay when he was working on smaller assignments. When he started throwing around very powerful magic though, and kept getting himself almost killed... I just got frustrated with the character for never buying a clue and learning from any of these situations. One of my biggest pet peeves with books is when characters are stupid. Harry started edging into that territory, and there were fewer clever mysteries, so my interest rapidly waned.

I could probably continue reading the series, but I don't like the characters enough to really pursue it, and knowing that Jim Butcher basically destroys the whole fabric of the setting in book 12 does not encourage me to read more. :/

They're not bad books-- like I said, the first few are really good page-turners and well-written-- but the series has lost my interest.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

I actually think that Harry is a very well developed character. He has flaws and things that are good about him and killer one liners.

Plus, I read aftermath, which is from Murphy's POV and the Codex Alera, which has several female POV characters. I don't think there's anything wrong with the way that Butcher writes females.

And I just watched an episode of the television series. I think the reason it was a flop is because they cast Murphy and Bob all wrong. Why is Murphy a stern looking brunette and why is Bob a butler-ish old man? And where is the Beetle? :O

J.Rudder
10685 words so far

i love, love, love the dresden files! i started w the series & it broke my heart it was cancelled:( i didn't even know they were books till after that. now i love the books too:)

& i think the tv murphy was perfectly cast:~P & bob, but he is totally diff than the book bob, & if i had read the books first i might think differently.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

Yeah, I suppose if I'd seen the show first, I wouldn't have a problem with TV Murphy. I'm just very used to spunky little blond Murphy and TV Murphy threw me a bit. I'm an enormous fan of the books and for me, the television series will never quite reach the same level of coolness.

Then again, I'm one of those people who will sit through a movie I've read the book to and pick every tiny little difference between the two and point all of them out. I know it's annoying -- it annoys me so god knows how other people sit through it. For me, the books are always the real version and movie/series is just a copy.

BUT, I don't actually mind the series. In fact, I quite like it. It's just not the same as the books and I will tell anyone within earshot just that, repeatedly, as I watch it.

R. Gray
1567 words so far

The Dresden Files are my favourite series at the moment. I enjoyed the Codex Alera, but it didn't grab me to the same degree that the DF's have.
Harry's character flaws, and the character flaws in the the supporting cast, are a large part of what makes the series. We, the readers, are getting to see the characters struggle and grow more than is common.
With the events of Changes & Ghost Story, I expect we'll see quite a difference in the various characters in the series over the next few books. Especially in Harry. Given the events and his experiences in Ghost Story, I think he'll find it difficult to continue along the same path as he was on before.
I, for one, am looking forward to finding out what Jim has in store for us in the future.

kat716 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

kat716
43510 words so far

Love, love, love them. Some more than others, true, but overall a great series. I want a Mouse... and maybe a Bob.

The Codex Alera was fantastic, too.

Smishy 6 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

Smishy
50055 words so far Winner!

Oh man I want a Mouse as well....Tibetan Mastiff is the breed I'm pretty sure he based him on...which is the dog that was sold for the most ever (like 2.5 million or something ridiculous like that)

Itzika 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

Itzika
1493 words so far

I got through about the first... six? before I just couldn't read them anymore. The mysteries were fantastic, the magic is awesome--but I hate Harry Dresden. He's not chivalrous. He's a chauvinist. And the series encourages his chauvinistic views with the responses and actions of every female character. Even Murphy encourages it--I forget what book it was, but he said women only liked motorcycles because they were... am I allowed to say it on this forum? I don't know... because it let them get it on, basically--and by the end of the book, Murphy agreed with him. Juliet, or whatever Thomas's lover's name is (I remember it started with a J) was SO sexualized and helpless it infuriated me, and just about every other female who showed up was in the same boat. Murphy was the only exception. So when she got hit with the White Court's lust-beam and shoved into that mold too, I gave up on the books.

Please, feel free to argue with me. I would love to be able to bring myself to read them again--like I said, they're fantastic mysteries, and I haven't found any paranormal mysteries to replace them. I just hate Harry Dresden.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

I don't think Harry is a chauvinist at all. If we're all about equal rights, that doesn't mean that men can't hold doors open for women etc it just means that women can also do it for men. Personally, I find those women who take chunks out of men who hold a door for them irritating. Equal rights doesn't mean everyone has to stop being polite to one another. I know 12 year old girls who hold doors open for middle-aged men. There's no need to be so uber sensitive about it.

I only think it's chauvanistic if someone says 'Woman, go and do your goddamn job and make me a sandwich. Stop trying to come and help me fight monsters, women are not allowed to do things like that," Harry has never, not once in the series, done that. In fact, I think the novels are full of strong female characters. Murphy, Susan, Lea, Charity, Georgia, Mab, Lara, Guard etc. I can actually name more strong female characters than male ones.

Also, if you stick with them a bit longer, Thomas's lover with a J develops massively as a character. Murphy NEVER becomes helpless/oversexualised/whatever else that I read. I actually disagree with you about the helpless over sexualised/helpless characters. I can't name any that I read that way.

Itzika 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

Itzika
1493 words so far

I'm not talking about him holding doors open for women. That actually didn't stand out for me in the series. I'm talking about him talking about how Justine (I remember her name now! I think) showed up at his office almost naked. I'm talking about him telling Murphy that the only reason she could POSSIBLY like motorcycles--the reason ALL WOMEN like motorcycles--is that they're basically something to pleasure themselves with. And then Murphy turning around and saying later that he was right. I'm talking about how when Susan was in total bloodlust mode, he calmed her down by chaining her up and doing her. These things stuck with me more than any chivalry.

And if I remember right, Lara was a Raith. As in, literally uses lust as a weapon. The first time we see her being strong, it's by taking her clothes off. I... don't see how that's a non-sexualized female.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

Eh, I don't know. I get where you're coming from about Lara but I don't really agree. Lust being her power, I don't really think it counts as oversexualisation if she uses it. I'm thinking along terms of 'that cat is too bloodthirsty because it's a cat'. Doesn't fit for me but I get what you're saying.

The motorcycle thing was a joke though. Both characters were joking. At least that's how I read it.

Hmm, not totally sure what I think about the Susan scene. It doesn't really fit with the rest of the book but it did have to happen for Changes to work. I don't know... I still don't think that makes it chauvanism. It didn't bother me but I can see how it could, I suppose.

I guess I just like Harry because he's not a white knight. He's not quite an anti-hero but he's not squeaky clean and I enjoy that in a character.

FlameRaven
51589 words so far Winner!

I think the problem comes in that there aren't very many women in the series (that I recall) who aren't sexualized in some sort of way. I mean, I think I remember Harry having thoughts along the lines of "Wow Molly is kinda hot/all grown up now...must not think that, that's my friend's kid." When all or nearly all your women characters are talked about in terms of appearance first and abilities later, it's a problem. Your female characters should not be defined in relationship to the men in their life, but a lot of them in Dresden are.

Think of it this way: yes, Lara's power is lust, so it makes sense that she would use it. But was it really necessary for Dresden to get stuck with the lustful demon? Could it not have been *just as interesting* for him to have a different sort of temptation. I mean, there's plenty of opportunity for him to slip given whatever his backstory is with the vampires and the black magic.

It's not the worst thing in the world, and I admit I didn't notice it immediately when reading the books, but after someone mentioned it I went back and found it really distracting because once you notice it, it is just everywhere in the books.

I don't tend to be easily offended by these things, but the Dresden books are, if not offensive, at least problematic. I think Jim Butcher has been called on this and tried to fix it, but I'm not sure he's done so... and I'm not really interested in reading the last few books to find out.

fuzz 7 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

fuzz
50001 words so far Winner!

I don't know. I kind of think that it's in first person and that's the way Harry thinks about it. I don't have a problem with it. Really, that's how a lot of people I know think about things, so I tend to just think it's realistic. I understand what you're saying though.

FlameRaven
51589 words so far Winner!

Yeah, I don't get too mad about it because I can see it both ways-- this is how Harry thinks, and Harry doesn't really understand why his way of thinking could be problematic.

I think the real issue people seem to run into is that Jim Butcher doesn't seem to understand why this is problematic either, so he can't really address it in the novels. I went hunting and found a couple discussions with him and various reviews, and I did lose a little respect for him in the process. I've already decided that his novels are probably not for me, though, so eh.

aurora17
84256 words so far Winner!

I had the Dresden Files novels recommended to me by my writing buddy and Brain Sister. They're a phenomenon, and they have some useful stuff in them about craft. I dealt with them by marking the stuff I hated and taking notes on the epic stuff.

But yeah, sexualizing every female who steps onto stage... very problematic. It's one of the things that makes my skin crawl about reading (some) male authors, because I start wondering if every male I encounter is some kind of predator/creep/perv.

As for the alleged "chivalry", I notice that it plays out in the early books with Harry withholding information from women, some of whom end up dead as a result. That's actually quite in line with the way women have been "protected" in past: protected from getting an education, protected from equal pay in the workplace... the list goes on. Chivalry is gracious behavior toward inferiors, and totally optional. Read history to see how real knights (chevaliers) behaved in practice: either "capture of Constantinople" or "siege of Jerusalem" will put you off your feed if you have a lick of imagination. In contemporary terms, if you're a "lady" or a "good girl", you're worthy of protection and respect, but otherwise you're fair game. (See "she was a slut so she deserved to get raped.")

The other thing I find highly problematic is the portrayal of the Catholic Church, again in light of the historical record. As for the Molly Carpenter subplot, I find more than a few things problematic about this, not least the picture of an adult sexualizing the child of a friend (a virtual nephew or niece). What's really insidious about this is the way it's written as "normal male response." If I had to go through and highlight every instance of sloppy biological determinism... I would have defaced my friend's books. :)

Most books are a tangle of things that you like and things that make your skin crawl... I'd say especially if you're reading from any historically underrepresented viewpoint (e.g. female, African-American, GLBT, Native American, etc.) So it's really important to think and criticize, and that means more than the binary of "squee!" and "it sucks."

Smishy 6 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

Smishy
50055 words so far Winner!

I love the books and I don't find him chauvinistic. He admits that he knows women can handle themselves fine but he can't help but want to protect them and he does the same with really anyone he cares about and after a few mistakes (yes people died because he withheld information that he thought would protect them from getting hurt). His need to protect women is a gut reaction, and quite common. Also the fact that when he sees a hot woman he immediately goes "DAAAAAAAMN" is a totally normal reaction, I mean I have it when I see a hot man or woman. There is an instant of hello and Molly Carpenter dresses to get that reaction (no I'm not saying she deserves to have violence enacted against her but she dresses in a provacative manner, especially when you first see her all growed up) so you can't get pissed when a guy has that reaction, provided they keep it to themselves and/or respects the rejection.

And Harry changes a lot through the series and I think we are going to see a very different Dresden after Ghost Story and I cannot wait.

Overall I find Butcher's portrayal of a above average intelligent, geeky but fairly typical guy excellent and I relate to most of his female characters and actually find them better balanced and more accurately portrayed than most female authors do.

anaia 4 months ago

Re: Dresden Files?

anaia

I really, really like the Dresden Files. I heard of it a couple years ago, but never did any research or anything until recently, when something on the net convinced me that it was something I might be interested in. So I bought a couple of the novels, Grave Peril and Summer Knight, as it was widely recommended to start from book three because books one and two were apparently not as good, and I figured that after two books I would know whether it was any good. I read Grave Peril, and I was reading it like I read most books that don't outright thrill me, just taking in the action and the dialogue and not really paying attention to the writing or really trying to get into the story. I think it was chapter 34 that made me fall in love. I, uh, smoked, and I sat down with the book (on my Kindle, if it matters), and all of a sudden I was totally in the world while Harry was locked in that tiny laundry room with Justine, envisioning everything with crystal clarity, all his torture and fear and guilt and pain, and that was it. I bought the entire series and read it, horribly out of order, in about four or five days.

I quite like Harry, as a character. I mean, sometimes he's an idiot, but if he reacted perfectly and rationally to everything 1) he wouldn't be terribly realistic, and 2) the books would be a lot shorter and not half as interesting. He has a weakness for women, so every time he sees one you have to get a long detailed description of her relative attractiveness, because he's a man and he comes into contact with a lot of ridiculously hot women in his line of work. But at the same time he goes without sex for years, because it has to mean something to him. Occasionally his chivalry gets him into trouble, just like his inability to let someone else handle a problem, or his pathological need to save everyone and everything he possibly can. But those quirks make him more relatable to me, because I know that Harry is not perfect or even particularly well-adjusted, and as a result the stories I read of his life are going to be chaotic and emotional and sad and funny, like he is. It's genuinely good stuff.

Who's online

There are currently 1755 users online.