I don't recall. Did it say ONLY these animals are accepted or just that those are the ones generally used by students? Gah, I need to go look at my book.
The list simply states that students may also bring an owl or a cat or a toad. I suppose it's up to interpretation if that sentence means to specifically limit which animals can come or if it is simply emphasizing that only one may be brought per student, but it is not required. It it interesting that it never was clarified in the books, even in passing.
I'm so confused as to the purpose of this thread, but I agree with the consensus. It's just recommended to have those three animals, but it really doesn't matter.
I'd rather think, that this animals were most common and some pupils would have more than one of them. So it should read "Either an owl or a cat or a toad", so that nobody would bring an owl, a cat _and_ a toad.
Harry potter book question
Why was Ron weasley allowed to have a rat when on the supple list it only says a cat or toad or owl?
Re: Harry potter book question
I'm not entirely certain. I think it's explained that it was deemed a creature of reasonable size and no one really minded it too much.
Re: Harry potter book question
Ok thanks I think I can work with that.
Re: Harry potter book question
Also, Percy had taken it to school before Ron so it's possible Percy requested and received special permission when he first went to school.
Re: Harry potter book question
He's not the only one with exceptional pets: If you remember, Lee Jordan had a Tarantula and Ginny had a Pygmy Puff.
It might be that the rules on pets are rarely enforced or that exceptions can be made.
Re: Harry potter book question
Probably it was small enough that nobody really bothered to enforce the rule. Who cares?
And as others have pointed out, there's other evidence of this (Lee's tarantuala and Ginny's pygmy puff).
Re: Harry potter book question
I don't recall. Did it say ONLY these animals are accepted or just that those are the ones generally used by students? Gah, I need to go look at my book.
Re: Harry potter book question
The list simply states that students may also bring an owl or a cat or a toad. I suppose it's up to interpretation if that sentence means to specifically limit which animals can come or if it is simply emphasizing that only one may be brought per student, but it is not required. It it interesting that it never was clarified in the books, even in passing.
Re: Harry potter book question
Yeah, just what everyone else says. It's okay, it doesn't really matter as long as it's like, I dunno, a crocodile.
Re: Harry potter book question
Heh. A crocodile at Hogwarts. Now that sounds like something out of fanfiction...
Sorry, that probably wasn't worth resuscitating (sp?) the thread for, but it was a rather amusing image... :D
Re: Harry potter book question
I'm so confused as to the purpose of this thread, but I agree with the consensus. It's just recommended to have those three animals, but it really doesn't matter.
Re: Harry potter book question
OP'll probably be writing a fanfic with OCs and wants to get details. :)
Re: Harry potter book question
Aaah. Got it.
Re: Harry potter book question
Additionally, they did not want students bringing like Unicorns or dogs or anything. :)
Re: Harry potter book question
Or giant spiders or dragon eggs, like Hagrid. :P
Re: Harry potter book question
I've always assumed that this was JKR's foreshadowing to the fact that the 'rat' isn't really a rat.
Re: Harry potter book question
I'd rather think, that this animals were most common and some pupils would have more than one of them. So it should read "Either an owl or a cat or a toad", so that nobody would bring an owl, a cat _and_ a toad.
Re: Harry potter book question
Moving to Fans and Critics
Re: Harry potter book question
I always thought of the pet list as a mistake on Rowling's part. You know, something she overlooked. But maybe not.