It is theoretically possible to sink a ship by filling it with a cargo which is less dense than water. The ship itself floats because its watertight hull displaces a volume of water and replaces that water it with something less dense. If the ship is empty, it replaces it with air. The resulting combination of ship and air is, on average, less dense than water. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy )
When you add cargo to the ship's hull you are displacing the air inside with something more dense than air (unless you happen to be hauling around helium) this causes the ship to sit lower in the water, as its average density is now higher and it must now displace more water. If you were to fill the ship with too much cargo and not enough air, then the resulting combination of cargo and ship could end up having a density greater than that of water and then it would sink.
As kayl noted above, butter itself might float but butter wrapped in something heavy enough wouldn't. In the case of a cargo ship which has had every last square inch packed with butter, we are talking about butter wrapped in steel.
To find out just how much butter it would take to sink your ship, or if it is even possible, we would need to know the ship's total volume (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_tonnage ), the total mass of the empty ship ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(ship) ), and density of the butter (865 kg/m3, thank you Aggie80).
So as an example, lets go with a WWII era Liberty ship. Now a Liberty ship's gross tonnage is usually given as 7,176 tones GRT. GRT, stands for gross register tonnage and one register ton is 100 cubic feet. A quick bit of maths tells us that our Liberty ship has a total interior volume of 20,308 cubic meters. We also know that a Liberty Ship has a light (empty) displacement of 3,380 Short Tons. This works out to be 3,066,284 kg. This means that absolutely empty our Liberty ship has an average density of 151 kg/m3 compared to 1025 kg/m3 on average for sea water. What do you know, it floats.
So how much butter will it take to sink it?
Well, given our average seawater density of 1025 kg/m3 and our volume of 20,308 cubic meters we would need a total weight of 20,815,700 kg. After subtracting the weight of the ship itself we need 17,769,724 kg of butter. But can we even fit that much butter inside our Liberty ship? Well, given the density of butter provided by Aggie80 we can calculate that would take 20,543 m3 of butter. That's more butter than our ship can hold. We're saved! Unless we're sailing on fresh water which has a lower density (1000 kg/m3) or water is very warm, there really isn't much wiggle room here. In fact it wouldn't take much ballast to turn our Liberty ship into a neutrally buoyant butter submarine.
World War II Liberty Ship butter submarine. I smell a new challenge.
But what about sugar then? Well, of the densities provided above by Aggie80 for sugar only "Sugar, raw cane" is high enough to sink our Liberty ship, requiring only 18,490 m3. I also found another source ( http://www.sugartech.co.za/density/index.php ) which lists bulk white sugar (880 m3) raw sugar in a pile (900 m3), amorphous sucrose (1507.7 m3) and sucrose crystal (1584.2 m3) as all being dense enough to sink our Liberty ship. So in theory it would be possible to sink our boat with sugar, but we would have to pack every available open space with the stuff. And that's just not too likely.
But before we get to cocky about our boat's butter hauling abilities, we might not need to actually sink our ship with butter to have our ship sink from too much butter.
Deadweight tonnage ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadweight_tonnage ) is how much weight a ship can carry before it starts sitting dangerously low in the water. Too low and waves could break over her top and swamp the ship. Once the water starts to get in the chances of our butter barge sinking go up dramatically.
A Liberty ship's deadweight was 10,856 long tons, or 11,030,205 kg. ( http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/C/a/Cargo_Ships.htm ) This is only 12,751 m3 of butter, well below our maximum internal volume of 20,308 m3. It is also less than the ship's regular cargo volume for grain cargo (14,297 m3) and just slightly more than bailed (12,695 m3). ( http://ww2ships.com/usa/us-os-001-b.shtml ). So if all we needed to do was load our Liberty ship up with enough butter that it would founder, take on water, and then sink. That might be possible.
....I'm tempted to read that entire thing again and just revel in the logic. Thanks to everyone who posted on this thread; your mathematical and scientific discussion has significantly brightened my day (er... night) and made it possible for me to push onward again. (I wonder if I could add butter to my story somehow..)
Excuse me while I sit here in awe of that amazingly educational post. I didn't go to sea school or anything, but as a writer, I applaud you for that kind of research.
I beg to differ. You drop a 5lb bag of sugar (wrapped in plastic) into a tub of water, it should most definitely drop to the bottom. And when I drop a teaspoon of sugar into my tea, it definitely sinks to the bottom, too.
I sense a Mythbusters episode in the offing, here. :)
(the butter's theoretically correct -- I wrapped a stick of butter in plastic wrap and floated it in the sink, but that's just one stick, and my husband stopped me before I could try the same with a sugar bag and the tub. Several hundred pounds of butter in crates, though? Um.)
It doesn't take much to sink a duct tape boat. I know this because I tried it at home, despite Adam and Jamie telling me not to at the beginning of every show.
The Mythbusters didn't do sinking, but floating. They were making a boat float with ping pong balls. They wanted to see how many it would take to make the boat rise to the surface
Aggie80 wrote:For starters, butter is mostly oil and will float, so no amount of butter will sink a ship.
Actually, ships use water displacement to float. So it's not a matter of density. For example, most of the metals used to make ships are more dense than water, but since the ship is shaped the way it is, buoyancy will push the ship up, as long as it's not too heavy. So, theorecically, if you can add enough butter to make the ship heavy enough, then it will sink.
Water displacement is a direct result of density, though. The buoyant force is equal to the weight of water displaced by an object. If the weight of the object is higher that the weight of the water displaced, the object will sink. If, on the other hand, the buoyant force/weight of displaced water equals (or is greater than) the weight of the object, it will float.
A boat doesn't float because of its shape. It floats because a boat is overall less dense than water. I know that sounds backwards because boats are, after all, made out of and filled with things much denser than water, but it's true because boats are actually filled with air, too, and between the air and the materials used to make the ship, its density is low enough for it to float in water. The only thing the shape does is allow the ship to efficiently hold large volumes of air and move more easily because it's streamlined.
Example! If a 100 pound boat is dropped in the water, and it pushes 101 pounds of water out of the way with its hull, it will float. If you now put 1.1 or more pounds of butter into the hull of the boat, everything will sink. butter & boat.
Heh, I'm currently in a physics class, and we just did Archimedes' Principle, including having to answer the question of why a boat floats on our lab report, so it's all very fresh in my mind! It's weird to think that a giant boat made out of steel is less dense than water, but on average, it is--so it floats.
That's a fair point. I've passed on the message :) Are there any ways you would be able to get butter to sink? It's unlikely, I know, but more likely than sugar xD
What about if the butter was packed in something? Whatever it was packed in would have to weigh more than the butter itself to stop the butter from floating. If whatever the butter is in is heavy enough, would it enable the butter (indirectly, at least) to sink the ship?
Since the density of butter is less than that of water, it floats. If you used packaging that would increase the density of the total package to something over 1000kg/cu.m, it would sink. But also note that once you package it, you have an issue with filling the vessel to the point were the space between the containers is offset as well.
Sugar has different densities depending on the type of sugar:
The density of sucrose -- that is, the density of the sugar crystal itself -- is 1587 kg/cu.m, or nearly 60% higher than that of water. Cane sugar is 99% sucrose. You can find this in your sugartech reference, and also on Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucrose
The reason for the difference with your figures is that in all of the cases you cite you have a surprising amount of air mixed in with the sugar. There should be no reason for powdered, granulated, and raw cane sugar to have such different densities, since the major difference between them is only the size of the sugar crystals. One of your references even gives different densities for the same type of sugar depending on whether it is bulk, bagged, or in a pile on the floor. This is why sugar is sold by weight, not volume (and why professional bakers will always weigh sugar, flour, salt, and the like, instead of measuring by volume).
As zenfrodo mentions above, sugar crystals demonstrably sink when added to water, which is what one would predict from the density of the crystal.
All that said, it wouldn't surprise me if a bag of sugar floats for a little while until water penetrates the package and displaces the air inside. With the sugar confined to a package, I expect it would take a long time to dissolve even in relatively warm water, since it would be difficult for water to circulate through the sugar crystals in that situation, but that would of course depend a lot on the packaging material.
Forgot say: As others have pointed out, the real issue here is not whether sugar or butter will float, but how their weight compares to the weight of the water displaced by the boat MINUS the weight of the boat. If the weight of the boat plus the weight of the cargo is more than the weight of the displaced water, the boat will sink -- it's as simple as that.
Therefore, a direct comparison of the density of butter and sugar to the density of water is not enough information to know whether the boat will sink -- the size and weight of the boat must be known as well. Given a heavy enough boat, cotton candy could sink it....
Isn't just the fact that you load the ship with more than it's maximum tonnage, essentially putting the butter IN a container (the ship), the ship would sink. Yes, the Edmond Fitzgerald had iron ore on board, more than the weight of the boat (refer to Gordon Lightfoot), but it still seems that weight added to weight will make something sink. The density lists are impressive, but it is kind of sad for this dinosaur to realize it didn't come out of the Monster CRC Chemistry Reference. Yes, the Internet is a great combination of the Mall of America and the Library of Congress, but it used to be fun browsing through books. I'm almost as bad as Capt. JT Kirk. He liked books too. Problem is, I just don't know where most of mine are and too broke to replace them, Kindle or otherwise.
Not claiming to be an expert or anything, but dropping a bag of sugar in water is rather misleading in this case. The real problem here is that boats are specifically designed not to sink. If you put the sugar in a vessel that's designed to float, it will take quite a bit more to offset the buoyancy that results from water displacement. (The weight of an object is reduced by its volume multiplied by the density of the fluid. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(fluid). )
It seems like all you really need is enough force to get the boat low enough in the water that flooding does the work even after the butter/sugar begins to dissolve or float away. And that really depends on how the butter/sugar is going to get on the boat in the first place.
If it's loaded bit by bit from a dock, then you probably want to look elsewhere for something with enough density to initiate the sinking process, for reasons previously mentioned.
On the other hand, if you're talking about dropping several tons on the boat from a cargo plane? Then it might work. Maybe.
Bearing in mind that it is not neccessary for the butter to sink; it is simply neccessary for the butter to lower the ship's sides far enough that water can get in and then the ship will proceed to sink by itself.
In simple terms, the upthrust caused by water, which we will call F, is determined by 9.81 (density of water) (volume submerged), or 9.81 (tonnage), where tonnage is the measurement used to determine the mass of water displaced
For the ship to float, F cannot be less than the weight of the ship plus its cargo.
Thus, at the limit just before it sinks, 9.81 (tonnage) = 9.81 (mass of ship) + 9.81 (mass of cargo), or, simplifying,
(Tonnage) = (combined mass of ship and cargo).
Rearranging gives us
(Mass of cargo) = (tonnage) - (mass of ship)
To sink the ship, therefore, you just need to find out if it is possible to pack that much butter onto the ship. My suspicion is yes, because even if filling the whole ship won't do it., you can just keep stacking more butter ON TOP of the ship.
A bit more help: You can probably find the total cargo space of the ship somewhere. The mass of butter that you can therefore fit in that cargo space would be this volume x (density of butter)
Sorry, I forgot that tonnage is only in terms of volume. You have to multiply by a factor of between 1000 to 1030, depending on fresh, briny, summer or winter water.
Since sugar is very hygroscopic, it will absorb a great deal of water. It is also more dense than water. Thus, fill boat with sugar, poke a hole(s) just under the water line so water reaches the sugar. The sugar will wick the water in, absorbing it. Some sugar will dissolve, but not very quickly. The sugar will turn into a heavy wet mess, the boat will be full of water AND stuff heavier than water, so down it will go. (May vary if the boat is made of superlight materials, but that's not typical) Now, I hope you weren't concerned about keeping the boat down. Most modern boats do have a certain amount of 'float material' in their construction so that even filled with water, they aren't supposed to sink. Eventually, sheer volume of water will dissolve all the sugar (and fish will need fillings), and the boat is likely to re-float (not well, its still full of water).
Butter?? Are we squeezing the Argo through narrow straights? Pfft. Throw the butter on the sugar, light boat on fire. Won't sink but might taste interesting. Cookie Cutter Ship?
Not being much of a chemist and horrible at math, I ask more about how the butter and such is supposed to be sinking said ship. On top of that, this also begs the question the setting/time of the story. Since more can be done to use butter as a weapon today than say 100 years ago: science and technology and such.
I'm sure there's a way to boil down butter and use it to cast something such as a cannonball shape. When frozen it could probably be powerfully effective - especially if fired/launched from another ship, or dingy. And if weighing science into it; I'm sure liquid nitrogen could help give a sphere of butter some hull-shattering capability.
Additionally, a well-directed shot to a propeller or rudder could do enough damage as well: clogging the engine or causing the ship to have steering issues.
If not speaking purely about butter, something inside of it could sink a boat. Making it a sticky bomb sort of substance (with the right sugar type and mixture), and with an electromagnet of sort...the ship could have its hull melted somehow. Adding in the salt water as a conductor, it could do wacky stuff. I know hearing a lot of modern fishing boats and such have so much electronics running through it, the corrosive power can be deadly if exposed wires and such breaching/melting the hull if a watchful eye isn't kept.
For what it's worth, there's a different way at looking at it. Hmmm... Butter. Do wonder the backstory on this question.
Way 1: Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar-1 cup Butter- 1/2 cup, melted. Instructions: Use sugar and butter to make cookies to put on the boat. Strategy: This causes the author to be anoyed that they cannot eat said cookies and so out of hatred they sink the ship. Added Word Count: It depends on if you are willing to break the fourth wall.
Way 2: Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar- 1 teaspoon to 50 pounds Butter- (Optional) Instructions: Give sugar to that hyper character, and a missle launcher. Strategy: Are you nuts!? He's hyper enough as is. Added Word Count: As long as hyper character isn't mute, there is no limit.
Way 3: Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar- 1 large bag Butter- Enough to Create a Surface Area Equivalent to Length of Ship Instructions: Butter the wooden deck of the carmel making ship. Strategy: When trying to move the sugar and fire to use for carmel (which they foolishly gave to one person) that person shall slip, light the deck on fire and sink the boat. Added Word Count: Well, it just lost me a potential 157 to come up with this, I don't know what it will gain you.
Way 4: Amount of Sugar and Butter: Whatever you feel like. Instructions: Make the setting of your historical fiction the Titanic. Strategy: Need I say more? Added Word Count: Hopefully 50,000 because this would be your whole book.
...I am the person who wanted this topic started, simply over some awesome cookies a NaNo-er brought to a write-in, who claimed she'd used enough butter/sugar to sink a ship.
I heard that you can make cookies from cake mix by leaving something out. Water, I think it was. I can't tell. Popcorn and potatoes (minus al-u-min'-ium foil) do fine in the microwave, my major cooking tool for eons, but cakes and cookies don't work quite as well.
How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
A fellow Nanoer with no access to this site today has an important question. Help him out?
How much butter and sugar is needed to sink a ship?
From what I've gathered, feel free to use whatever sort of ship you'd like to get your answer.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
It is theoretically possible to sink a ship by filling it with a cargo which is less dense than water. The ship itself floats because its watertight hull displaces a volume of water and replaces that water it with something less dense. If the ship is empty, it replaces it with air. The resulting combination of ship and air is, on average, less dense than water. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buoyancy )
When you add cargo to the ship's hull you are displacing the air inside with something more dense than air (unless you happen to be hauling around helium) this causes the ship to sit lower in the water, as its average density is now higher and it must now displace more water. If you were to fill the ship with too much cargo and not enough air, then the resulting combination of cargo and ship could end up having a density greater than that of water and then it would sink.
As kayl noted above, butter itself might float but butter wrapped in something heavy enough wouldn't. In the case of a cargo ship which has had every last square inch packed with butter, we are talking about butter wrapped in steel.
To find out just how much butter it would take to sink your ship, or if it is even possible, we would need to know the ship's total volume (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_tonnage ), the total mass of the empty ship ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(ship) ), and density of the butter (865 kg/m3, thank you Aggie80).
So as an example, lets go with a WWII era Liberty ship. Now a Liberty ship's gross tonnage is usually given as 7,176 tones GRT. GRT, stands for gross register tonnage and one register ton is 100 cubic feet. A quick bit of maths tells us that our Liberty ship has a total interior volume of 20,308 cubic meters. We also know that a Liberty Ship has a light (empty) displacement of 3,380 Short Tons. This works out to be 3,066,284 kg. This means that absolutely empty our Liberty ship has an average density of 151 kg/m3 compared to 1025 kg/m3 on average for sea water. What do you know, it floats.
So how much butter will it take to sink it?
Well, given our average seawater density of 1025 kg/m3 and our volume of 20,308 cubic meters we would need a total weight of 20,815,700 kg. After subtracting the weight of the ship itself we need 17,769,724 kg of butter. But can we even fit that much butter inside our Liberty ship? Well, given the density of butter provided by Aggie80 we can calculate that would take 20,543 m3 of butter. That's more butter than our ship can hold. We're saved! Unless we're sailing on fresh water which has a lower density (1000 kg/m3) or water is very warm, there really isn't much wiggle room here. In fact it wouldn't take much ballast to turn our Liberty ship into a neutrally buoyant butter submarine.
World War II Liberty Ship butter submarine. I smell a new challenge.
But what about sugar then? Well, of the densities provided above by Aggie80 for sugar only "Sugar, raw cane" is high enough to sink our Liberty ship, requiring only 18,490 m3. I also found another source ( http://www.sugartech.co.za/density/index.php ) which lists bulk white sugar (880 m3) raw sugar in a pile (900 m3), amorphous sucrose (1507.7 m3) and sucrose crystal (1584.2 m3) as all being dense enough to sink our Liberty ship. So in theory it would be possible to sink our boat with sugar, but we would have to pack every available open space with the stuff. And that's just not too likely.
But before we get to cocky about our boat's butter hauling abilities, we might not need to actually sink our ship with butter to have our ship sink from too much butter.
Deadweight tonnage ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadweight_tonnage ) is how much weight a ship can carry before it starts sitting dangerously low in the water. Too low and waves could break over her top and swamp the ship. Once the water starts to get in the chances of our butter barge sinking go up dramatically.
A Liberty ship's deadweight was 10,856 long tons, or 11,030,205 kg. ( http://pwencycl.kgbudge.com/C/a/Cargo_Ships.htm ) This is only 12,751 m3 of butter, well below our maximum internal volume of 20,308 m3. It is also less than the ship's regular cargo volume for grain cargo (14,297 m3) and just slightly more than bailed (12,695 m3). ( http://ww2ships.com/usa/us-os-001-b.shtml ). So if all we needed to do was load our Liberty ship up with enough butter that it would founder, take on water, and then sink. That might be possible.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
You, are my hero. I graduated from a Maritime school and you just made my day. XD
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Wow I like that thank you for making my Day!!!!
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
This rocks my socks. Why aren't more people so blithely intellectually bad-ass as you?
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
....I'm tempted to read that entire thing again and just revel in the logic.
Thanks to everyone who posted on this thread; your mathematical and scientific discussion has significantly brightened my day (er... night) and made it possible for me to push onward again. (I wonder if I could add butter to my story somehow..)
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
dang. lol
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I love you.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
wow-this is awesome
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Best Answer EVER!
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Excuse me while I sit here in awe of that amazingly educational post. I didn't go to sea school or anything, but as a writer, I applaud you for that kind of research.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
For starters, butter is mostly oil and will float, so no amount of butter will sink a ship.
Sugar is less dense than water. If it didn't dissolve, sugar would float as well. So if you wrapped it in a water tight unit, it should float.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I beg to differ. You drop a 5lb bag of sugar (wrapped in plastic) into a tub of water, it should most definitely drop to the bottom. And when I drop a teaspoon of sugar into my tea, it definitely sinks to the bottom, too.
I sense a Mythbusters episode in the offing, here. :)
(the butter's theoretically correct -- I wrapped a stick of butter in plastic wrap and floated it in the sink, but that's just one stick, and my husband stopped me before I could try the same with a sugar bag and the tub. Several hundred pounds of butter in crates, though? Um.)
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Mythbusters did something similar to this I think LOL
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Hey! What if we sink a silver duct tape boat, or the one made of frozen newspapers??
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
It doesn't take much to sink a duct tape boat. I know this because I tried it at home, despite Adam and Jamie telling me not to at the beginning of every show.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Hahahaha! I love you, man!
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
The Mythbusters didn't do sinking, but floating. They were making a boat float with ping pong balls. They wanted to see how many it would take to make the boat rise to the surface
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
ohhh wow you actualy tried this jelus you guys all have awsome lifes
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
The density of table sugar, sucrose, is greater than that of water (1.587g/mL vs. 1g/mL).
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Actually, ships use water displacement to float. So it's not a matter of density. For example, most of the metals used to make ships are more dense than water, but since the ship is shaped the way it is, buoyancy will push the ship up, as long as it's not too heavy. So, theorecically, if you can add enough butter to make the ship heavy enough, then it will sink.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Water displacement is a direct result of density, though. The buoyant force is equal to the weight of water displaced by an object. If the weight of the object is higher that the weight of the water displaced, the object will sink. If, on the other hand, the buoyant force/weight of displaced water equals (or is greater than) the weight of the object, it will float.
A boat doesn't float because of its shape. It floats because a boat is overall less dense than water. I know that sounds backwards because boats are, after all, made out of and filled with things much denser than water, but it's true because boats are actually filled with air, too, and between the air and the materials used to make the ship, its density is low enough for it to float in water. The only thing the shape does is allow the ship to efficiently hold large volumes of air and move more easily because it's streamlined.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Spot on.
Example!
If a 100 pound boat is dropped in the water, and it pushes 101 pounds of water out of the way with its hull, it will float.
If you now put 1.1 or more pounds of butter into the hull of the boat, everything will sink. butter & boat.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Heh, I'm currently in a physics class, and we just did Archimedes' Principle, including having to answer the question of why a boat floats on our lab report, so it's all very fresh in my mind! It's weird to think that a giant boat made out of steel is less dense than water, but on average, it is--so it floats.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
That's a fair point. I've passed on the message :) Are there any ways you would be able to get butter to sink? It's unlikely, I know, but more likely than sugar xD
What about if the butter was packed in something? Whatever it was packed in would have to weigh more than the butter itself to stop the butter from floating. If whatever the butter is in is heavy enough, would it enable the butter (indirectly, at least) to sink the ship?
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Water has a density of 1000kg/cu.m
Butter has a density of 865 kg/cu.m
Since the density of butter is less than that of water, it floats. If you used packaging that would increase the density of the total package to something over 1000kg/cu.m, it would sink. But also note that once you package it, you have an issue with filling the vessel to the point were the space between the containers is offset as well.
Sugar has different densities depending on the type of sugar:
Sugar, brown 721kg/cu.m
Sugar, powdered 801kg/cu.m
Sugar, granulated 849kg/cu.m
Sugar, raw cane 961kg/cu.m
Sugarbeet pulp, dry 208kg/cu.m
Sugarbeet pulp, wet 561kg/cu.m
Sugarcane 272kg/cu.m
Note that all of them have densities that are less than water, indicating that they should float.
http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_materials.htm
http://sugartech.co.za/density/
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
The density of sucrose -- that is, the density of the sugar crystal itself -- is 1587 kg/cu.m, or nearly 60% higher than that of water. Cane sugar is 99% sucrose. You can find this in your sugartech reference, and also on Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucrose
The reason for the difference with your figures is that in all of the cases you cite you have a surprising amount of air mixed in with the sugar. There should be no reason for powdered, granulated, and raw cane sugar to have such different densities, since the major difference between them is only the size of the sugar crystals. One of your references even gives different densities for the same type of sugar depending on whether it is bulk, bagged, or in a pile on the floor. This is why sugar is sold by weight, not volume (and why professional bakers will always weigh sugar, flour, salt, and the like, instead of measuring by volume).
As zenfrodo mentions above, sugar crystals demonstrably sink when added to water, which is what one would predict from the density of the crystal.
All that said, it wouldn't surprise me if a bag of sugar floats for a little while until water penetrates the package and displaces the air inside. With the sugar confined to a package, I expect it would take a long time to dissolve even in relatively warm water, since it would be difficult for water to circulate through the sugar crystals in that situation, but that would of course depend a lot on the packaging material.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Forgot say: As others have pointed out, the real issue here is not whether sugar or butter will float, but how their weight compares to the weight of the water displaced by the boat MINUS the weight of the boat. If the weight of the boat plus the weight of the cargo is more than the weight of the displaced water, the boat will sink -- it's as simple as that.
Therefore, a direct comparison of the density of butter and sugar to the density of water is not enough information to know whether the boat will sink -- the size and weight of the boat must be known as well. Given a heavy enough boat, cotton candy could sink it....
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Isn't just the fact that you load the ship with more than it's maximum tonnage, essentially putting the butter IN a container (the ship), the ship would sink. Yes, the Edmond Fitzgerald had iron ore on board, more than the weight of the boat (refer to Gordon Lightfoot), but it still seems that weight added to weight will make something sink.
The density lists are impressive, but it is kind of sad for this dinosaur to realize it didn't come out of the Monster CRC Chemistry Reference. Yes, the Internet is a great combination of the Mall of America and the Library of Congress, but it used to be fun browsing through books. I'm almost as bad as Capt. JT Kirk. He liked books too. Problem is, I just don't know where most of mine are and too broke to replace them, Kindle or otherwise.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Not claiming to be an expert or anything, but dropping a bag of sugar in water is rather misleading in this case. The real problem here is that boats are specifically designed not to sink. If you put the sugar in a vessel that's designed to float, it will take quite a bit more to offset the buoyancy that results from water displacement. (The weight of an object is reduced by its volume multiplied by the density of the fluid. Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(fluid). )
It seems like all you really need is enough force to get the boat low enough in the water that flooding does the work even after the butter/sugar begins to dissolve or float away. And that really depends on how the butter/sugar is going to get on the boat in the first place.
If it's loaded bit by bit from a dock, then you probably want to look elsewhere for something with enough density to initiate the sinking process, for reasons previously mentioned.
On the other hand, if you're talking about dropping several tons on the boat from a cargo plane? Then it might work. Maybe.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I'd say load the ship up with several tons of butter & sugar, then have a saboteur plant an explosive in the middle of it all.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
When in doubt, always make it explode
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
This site needs a like button. That made my day.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Bearing in mind that it is not neccessary for the butter to sink; it is simply neccessary for the butter to lower the ship's sides far enough that water can get in and then the ship will proceed to sink by itself.
In simple terms, the upthrust caused by water, which we will call F, is determined by 9.81 (density of water) (volume submerged), or 9.81 (tonnage), where tonnage is the measurement used to determine the mass of water displaced
For the ship to float, F cannot be less than the weight of the ship plus its cargo.
Thus, at the limit just before it sinks, 9.81 (tonnage) = 9.81 (mass of ship) + 9.81 (mass of cargo), or, simplifying,
(Tonnage) = (combined mass of ship and cargo).
Rearranging gives us
(Mass of cargo) = (tonnage) - (mass of ship)
To sink the ship, therefore, you just need to find out if it is possible to pack that much butter onto the ship. My suspicion is yes, because even if filling the whole ship won't do it., you can just keep stacking more butter ON TOP of the ship.
A bit more help: You can probably find the total cargo space of the ship somewhere. The mass of butter that you can therefore fit in that cargo space would be this volume x (density of butter)
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Sorry, I forgot that tonnage is only in terms of volume. You have to multiply by a factor of between 1000 to 1030, depending on fresh, briny, summer or winter water.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
DON'T PING THE HYDRA!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Here's a real world anecdote to ponder regarding this weighty topic:
http://www.snopes.com/food/prepare/tapioca.asp
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Wow. That would make a fantastic disaster movie.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I like the idea of wrapping butter or sugar in steel.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Since sugar is very hygroscopic, it will absorb a great deal of water. It is also more dense than water. Thus, fill boat with sugar, poke a hole(s) just under the water line so water reaches the sugar. The sugar will wick the water in, absorbing it. Some sugar will dissolve, but not very quickly. The sugar will turn into a heavy wet mess, the boat will be full of water AND stuff heavier than water, so down it will go. (May vary if the boat is made of superlight materials, but that's not typical) Now, I hope you weren't concerned about keeping the boat down. Most modern boats do have a certain amount of 'float material' in their construction so that even filled with water, they aren't supposed to sink. Eventually, sheer volume of water will dissolve all the sugar (and fish will need fillings), and the boat is likely to re-float (not well, its still full of water).
Butter?? Are we squeezing the Argo through narrow straights? Pfft. Throw the butter on the sugar, light boat on fire. Won't sink but might taste interesting. Cookie Cutter Ship?
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Where the hell is the Like Button?? LOL!
+1 Internetz for the Cookie Cutter idea.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Yes.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Not being much of a chemist and horrible at math, I ask more about how the butter and such is supposed to be sinking said ship. On top of that, this also begs the question the setting/time of the story. Since more can be done to use butter as a weapon today than say 100 years ago: science and technology and such.
I'm sure there's a way to boil down butter and use it to cast something such as a cannonball shape. When frozen it could probably be powerfully effective - especially if fired/launched from another ship, or dingy. And if weighing science into it; I'm sure liquid nitrogen could help give a sphere of butter some hull-shattering capability.
Additionally, a well-directed shot to a propeller or rudder could do enough damage as well: clogging the engine or causing the ship to have steering issues.
If not speaking purely about butter, something inside of it could sink a boat. Making it a sticky bomb sort of substance (with the right sugar type and mixture), and with an electromagnet of sort...the ship could have its hull melted somehow. Adding in the salt water as a conductor, it could do wacky stuff. I know hearing a lot of modern fishing boats and such have so much electronics running through it, the corrosive power can be deadly if exposed wires and such breaching/melting the hull if a watchful eye isn't kept.
For what it's worth, there's a different way at looking at it. Hmmm... Butter. Do wonder the backstory on this question.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Butter cannonball.. I feel like you've inadvertently shared one piece spoilers. It just sounds like something that show would do.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
get the butter hot and you could always just burn a whole in the ship and it would sink. does that count?
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Three ways to sink a ship with sugar and butter:
Way 1:
Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar-1 cup Butter- 1/2 cup, melted.
Instructions: Use sugar and butter to make cookies to put on the boat.
Strategy: This causes the author to be anoyed that they cannot eat said cookies and so out of hatred they sink the ship.
Added Word Count: It depends on if you are willing to break the fourth wall.
Way 2:
Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar- 1 teaspoon to 50 pounds Butter- (Optional)
Instructions: Give sugar to that hyper character, and a missle launcher.
Strategy: Are you nuts!? He's hyper enough as is.
Added Word Count: As long as hyper character isn't mute, there is no limit.
Way 3:
Amount of Sugar and Butter: Sugar- 1 large bag Butter- Enough to Create a Surface Area Equivalent to Length of Ship
Instructions: Butter the wooden deck of the carmel making ship.
Strategy: When trying to move the sugar and fire to use for carmel (which they foolishly gave to one person) that person shall slip, light the deck on fire and sink the boat.
Added Word Count: Well, it just lost me a potential 157 to come up with this, I don't know what it will gain you.
Way 4:
Amount of Sugar and Butter: Whatever you feel like.
Instructions: Make the setting of your historical fiction the Titanic.
Strategy: Need I say more?
Added Word Count: Hopefully 50,000 because this would be your whole book.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
The saga of Butter and Sugar on the Titanic... it could be like a prequel to the old Milk and Cheese comics.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
...I am the person who wanted this topic started, simply over some awesome cookies a NaNo-er brought to a write-in, who claimed she'd used enough butter/sugar to sink a ship.
This is AWESOME.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Congrats. You win. :)
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
And it's questions like these that makes me love this community.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Awesome.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Perhaps if you set the materials on fire you could sink a ship.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I want cookies.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
I heard that you can make cookies from cake mix by leaving something out. Water, I think it was.
I can't tell. Popcorn and potatoes (minus al-u-min'-ium foil) do fine in the microwave, my major cooking tool for eons, but cakes and cookies don't work quite as well.
Re: How much butter/sugar is needed to sink a ship?
Put all the butter and sugar on one side of the ship. The heavy wieght along with being off balance should get one side low enough for water to enter.