RSS

Too Controversial?

Display mode:
riddikulus-grin
51421 words so far Winner!

My story is set in a world where proof of God was found and "The Church" took over. However, it's going to turn out that they lied about their proof for power, and they're pretty evil. It's unlikely this will be published, but I will be giving it to friends and family, some of which are religious. Will this tread on any toes, would you say? Is it a bad thing if it does?

coppertoe
52828 words so far Winner!

Amy Sparrow has done her homework, which includes checking the facts, not just swallowing what we're taught in school and definitely not swallowing the media swill.

That said, your idea is a good one, though I was going to suggest you make up your own religion (heh - Amy beat me to it).

Be sure to read up on what makes a cult (I saw someone on another thread define it completely incorrectly), as following the "symptom list" will aid you in your writing and help make the story plausible. You might also want to read up on the history of the Jesuits, who are/were--behind their public face--basically the Vatican's army. Such an element can add a nice bit of cloak-and-dagger intrigue to your story.

As for controversial, I think we have to disregard the idea of offending someone while not going so far as to be in poor taste. (What was that Lincoln said? "You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the time." And these days, it's VERY politically correct to be offended. *rolls eyes* Bunch of big babies, that's what we've become. =D

allynwriter
50088 words so far Winner!

If you want an idea of what makes a group a cult, check Robert J. Lifton's criteria for what makes a mind control group:
http://www.ex-cult.org/General/lifton-criteria

kimberj103
38444 words so far

Sounds a bit like the Golden Compass trilogy...

Unequaled108
51250 words so far Winner!

If you have to ask your self, "Will this offend someone?" the answer is yes.

Your story will offend someone. My story will offend someone. Chances are, there is someone out there who would be offended by every story written this November.

It's said that the two topics to avoid in polite company are politics and religion. Your story covers both. This means it will offend a lot of people.

The questions you should be asking aren't, "Is this going to offend someone, and if so, is that a bad thing?"

You should be asking, "Do I care if my story offends people, and if so, why do I care?"

riddikulus-grin
51421 words so far Winner!

Hmm... I guess you're right. And although I care about not offending people, I like my plot too much to just let it go. Maybe controversial is just what it needs to be an exciting read!

AsYouKnowBob
7464 words so far

And while you're exploring why you care, it could make good grist for your story, too!

AmySparrow
50163 words so far Winner!

As a Christian who does believe there is scientific proof for a God, I would say that is a touchy subject. Most public schools now teach evolution as a fact, when it's really only a theory that requires as much faith to believe as creationism does. We already get bombarded by people telling us we are silly and can't see proof if it slapped us in the face when that "proof" is really just another scientist's theory or someone manipulating the evidence. Many, many scientists out there do believe in Creationism, and have evidence that points to it, but if they were to try to announce that and publish their findings in a scientific journal, then chances are high that they would be completely discredited and often would loose all funding to continue the research.

Just one example of how the mainstream media controls what is believed--global warming has been proven to be a hoax, but you don't hear about that because the media chooses not to talk about it. In fact, most people reading this probably don't believe me at all, because they've spent their whole lives being taught otherwise.

All that to say, the deck is already stacked against us. Why bother poking fun at us all the more? I would say your religious family would be at least a little peeved at once again being portrayed as the bad, stupid guys. But then, we are kind of used to it, so it's nothing new.

Of course it's completely up to you. You can write whatever you want and like the above person mentioned, anything and everything you write will offend someone out there. If, however, you decided you didn't want to step on those particular toes but still like your storyline, one possible option would be to make the religious group a cult--not mainstream Christians but some other made-up religion that is clearly different.

riddikulus-grin
51421 words so far Winner!

Actually, that's perfect! It'll be a cult, rather than conventional Christains. (oh, and so you know, I have no problem with Christainity. In fact, I came up with this plot when I was still one myself [I've recently become more agnostic] and have been playing with the idea for ages.)

lurgee
50026 words so far Winner!

I would say that Christians have spent te last two thousand years stepping on each others toes, so it's a bit late for them to get precious about it now. The history of organised Christianity - in my (athiestical) opinion - has been one controlling organisation trying to win power from another. Catholic Church vs Celtic vs Ptrotestant vs Orthodox vs ... Cathars vs ... and so on.

I think you should make it some regonisable form of Christian church. Otherwise it'll get lumped as fantasy and irrelevant, whereas - I assume - you're trying to make a serious point. Social institutions have to be held up to ridicule or questioning. You could specifically draw on the points I raised below, about the difference between the teachings of Jesus and the policies of the organised churches. Perhaps - oooooh, this could be funny - the Bible is a banned book, along with the Communist Manifesto and The Origin of Species, and only exists in an expurgated form, because what Jesus actually said is too challenging to church doctrine. And then someone stumbles upon a complete (as it were) version of the bible, and discoveres the edits that have been made. "What do you mean, money lenders should be thrown out of the temple? ... Forgiving your enemies? ... Being meek, mild and quiet in your worship? The poor shall inherit the Earth and ther rich can't get into heavern? What strange faith is this?"

NateDavis1798
0 words so far

Evolution is observable . . .

AmySparrow
50163 words so far Winner!

Yes, Nate, micro-evolution (such as having different species of canines and different skin tones in humans) is very observable and no one disputes it. But macro-evolution where one species turns into a different species has never been observed and there are still a great number of "missing links." Every time we've tried to combine two species such as a horse and donkey making a mule--the offspring are infertile, unable to bear another generation. The same thing is true of mixed plants.

Backbones
4789 words so far

http://www.dbskeptic.com/2008/06/21/macro-evolution-observed-in-the-laboratory/

NateDavis1798
0 words so far

Trying to manually mix one species with a completely different species is not evolution in any sense of the word.

It's observable through the fossil record. There is a very clear, very definite progression from Ape to Man; anyone with eyes can see it. No faith required.

AmySparrow
50163 words so far Winner!

Backbone, I love that that article quotes from Wikipedia, which anyone can write anything on so is a completely unreliable source. But it does have some other interesting comments. The other problem with evolution that the article didn't address is that something has ever been created from nothing.

Nate Davis, the fossil record is actually not so clear. Most of the ape to human skeletons found were later realized to actually be mixed up parts of several different known species' bones, such as Lucy who was part pig and part human and only a few bones of each were found anyway--certainly not a full skeleton. The fossil dating is also open to consideration since carbon dating uses surrounding rocks to date the fossils and the fossils to date the rocks.

But, I don't think any of us will be very likely to change anyone's mind here, and we've very much deviated from the point of the thread, so I'll stop posting about evolution here. :-)

Cadaverine
50355 words so far Winner!

Lucy is not part pig and part human. She is also an astoundingly complete fossil skeleton. I am concerned that your source may be outright lying to you, which is dishonourable and a shame. Look at the fossils. Read the literature. It is not the aim of science to mislead, but seek knowledge.

Carbon dating is not used in dating fossils of this age as carbon's half-life is not long enough. Radiometric dating is used.

Wikipedia is a good source when an article is well cited. Look at the references and at the discussion page to ascertain the value of an article. Rejecting it wholesale because it can be edited is unwarranted, imo.

Backbones
4789 words so far

That 'something has ever been created from nothing' is not a problem with evolution. Evolution, remember, is not a 'stand-in' for Creationism. It doesn't purport to tell us where or how life originated -- only how it develops.

The article cites wikipedia, but it isn't using wikipedia as a primary source.

NateDavis1798
0 words so far

I was referring specifically to skulls. I once made a little slide show of hominid skulls for a science class; watching the progression actually gave me chills. It's almost like those time-lapse movies of flowers blooming.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

Allow me to agree with Amy's last point here - enough.

I'm not quite sure why every website on the internet has to have at least one or fifty discussions that end up devolving into an evolution vs. intelligent design debate.

But this thread is neither the appropriate thread nor the appropriate message board for such. This is intended to write religious literature, not debate religious ideas. Take this conversion to off topic - http://www.nanowrimo.org/en/forums/off-topic

This post has rambled far beyond the poster's initial question. Get back to answering the initial post or I'll lock this thread and send it to off topic and let them deal with people who haven't seemed to understand that no one ever changes their mind on intelligent design or evolution based off an argument they had with someone in a forum for writing religious fiction.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

I'm not quite sure why every website on the internet has to have at least one or fifty discussions that end up devolving into an evolution vs. intelligent design debate.

But this thread is neither the appropriate thread nor the appropriate message board for such. This is intended to write religious literature, not debate religious ideas. Take this conversion to off topic - http://www.nanowrimo.org/en/forums/off-topic

This post has rambled far beyond the poster's initial question. Get back to answering the initial post or I'll lock this thread and send it to off topic and let them deal with people who haven't seemed to understand that no one ever changes their mind on intelligent design or evolution based off an argument they had with someone in a forum for writing religious fiction.

sassimint
50058 words so far Winner!

So are miracles.

sassimint
50058 words so far Winner!

So are miracles.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

Hi and welcome to the Religious Lit forum. We all need to be careful about absolute statements. Please use I statements.

Example-

"Most public schools now teach evolution as a fact, when it's really only a theory that requires as much faith to believe as creationism does" should be something like "I believe that it's really only a theory..."

There are no wrong ideas/opinions here, but you need to denote they are your ideas/opinions. If you want to get into a theological discussion/argument, this isn't the place for it. Hit up the Writing Clubs or the Off Topic forum. Thanks!

TheTabster
0 words so far

I've just got to point out here, it's not just an opinion... it is still only a theory, as evolution has not been proven, so how is it wrong to point out that it is still just a theory. It's only an opinion if it was a proven fact and someone was still stating they did not believe in it.

Backbones
4789 words so far

http://www.notjustatheory.com/

An argument built around semantic disagreements is a pretty bad one.

NateDavis1798
0 words so far

It's only a theory, just like gravity. And right triangles.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

If you want to argue about evolution vs. intelligent design, this is not the place for it. Pop over to off topic, although I dont know why people want to have this debate again since it shows up pretty much everywhere on the internet and in life. Can't we agree to disagree and move on? Apparently not.

And please phrase your beliefs as your beliefs with I statements. For example "I've just got to point out here, it's not just an opinion... it is still only a theory, as evolution has not been proven," should be something like "I've just got to point out here, I don't believe that it's not just an opinion... I believe it is still only a theory, as evolution has not been proven,"

You might see it as only a theory, and someone else might be highly offended by your statement. And we're all going to do our best not to offend anyone, since that's not the point of this genre forum. It's to help you write religious literature.

Now, let's stop getting away from the Initial Posters query onto tangents that have nothing to do with writing religious fiction. If this thread devolves into an evolution debate, I"ll ask it be locked or moved to off topic, which wouldn't be fair to the initial poster with their legitimate question.

TheTabster
0 words so far

"You might see it as only a theory, and someone else might be highly offended by your statement. And we're all going to do our best not to offend anyone, since that's not the point of this genre forum. It's to help you write religious literature. "

Right. Because it is not okay to offend a scientist and an atheist, but it is okay to offend a person who believes in Creationism by indicating something has been 100% proven that has not been.

I'm now being reminded why I avoided this forum in the first place.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

If you'll care to notice, I also left the same comment on the threads you mention as being offensive as well. But, always assume the best, you might have not seem them due to the wonky threaded view. (One is in reply to the NateDavis post from two days ago.) Even if you don't believe I have good intentions, I do. This forum is about writing religious fiction, not about religion in general.

TheTabster
0 words so far

I get that, I do.

I just don't think it's right that someone should have to put 'in my opinion' when it's not an opinion, they're just commenting on a fact.

As far as your comments on NateDavis' posts, I apologize, they were not showing up in my thread (I still can't actually see them now).

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

Threaded view is still somewhat wonky. I hear you on that front.

nodgene

AmySparrow wrote:
Most public schools now teach evolution as a fact, when it's really only a theory that requires as much faith to believe as creationism does.

If that's how you feel, perhaps you do not understand the scientific appreciation of the word "theory" or the factual basis for evolutionary science.

"Theory" in science does not mean it's an unproven thought; quite the opposite (theory of relativity?). It means a proposal which for the meantime is backed by what reason and evidence we have. Furthermore the underlying evidence supporting evolutionary science is applied to so many other aspects of modern science and life. Geology is linked strongly to evolutionary science, and knowledge from that is critical in prospecting for oil and gas, for instance.

Furthermore, other scientific theories tend to suit the argument for creationism quite well (although not literally, that's silly). The Big Bang theory (which if you dislike, you have to explain away the conclusions from Red Shift and the observed electromagnetic background noise of the universe) fits quite neatly with the idea of creation being a process which roughly referred to eons in time.

To say it requires "faith" is also incorrect, assuming we're using the English language. "Faith" is something that is a belief in whatever without any evidence to support that. Since there is plenty of supporting evidence in evolutionary science it can not be called "faith" to support it, unless you don't understand it and just say "yeah I agree". Unless you're suggesting the Mormon view that dinosaur bones only exist because God apparently wants to trick people into disbelieving... which does not make much sense... theologically, if God is meant to be all-loving, or logically... as it would make the faith the preserve of the gullible and illiterate. But there are far more religious people who accept modern science than reject it. I'd just suggest you do some reading to sharpen your knowledge on the issue, before making unsupported accusations.

screaming jay

Yes, of course it will step on toes.

But, is whether or not it would be regarded by the public as "too" controversial very important to you at the Nanowrimo stage?

If it's any comfort, there are lots of fiction books that are critical of religion and/or posit a world in which religion is either gone or gone amok.

nodgene

screaming jay wrote:
Yes, of course it will step on toes.

But, is whether or not it would be regarded by the public as "too" controversial very important to you at the Nanowrimo stage?

If it's any comfort, there are lots of fiction books that are critical of religion and/or posit a world in which religion is either gone or gone amok.


Yeah, "The Satanic Verses" got quite the reception from the Islamic community's fanatics. And then other major works of fiction don't exactly shy away from controversy "Lolita".

Just don't worry. Write a story and make it a good story. :)

lurgee
50026 words so far Winner!

People who blithely accept stuff need to be challenged, whether it be religion (seems ot be doing quite well inspite of the allegedly 'stacked deck'), global warming (though it has not been 'proven' to be a hoax, and anyone suggesting it has need to apply some of the doubt to their own convictions they are applying to others), or whether the moon is made of blue cheese.

Though it is worth pointing out the only people almost as tiresome as the fervently religious are the equally fervent irreligious like Dawkins or Hitchens. Oh, and Apple fanatics. They're as tiresome as the religious and irreligious put together.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

*snuggles with his macbook*

Ok. On a more serious note, let's not let this thread devolved from the Initial Poster's query. Thanks!

Lady_L
11159 words so far

I'm with Unequaled here - there are probably going to be elements in most books that will offend someone. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't write it. People can choose to read or not to read something, if your book offends someone they can choose to stop reading it - you are not forcing someone to read it! If every writer had censored themselves because someone might have been offended by what they had written I am sure some great classics would never have been published!
Also, I think the word 'offend' is quite strong - there might be parts of the book that people may disagree with and not like but I don't take 'offense' if someone says something I disagree with/don't like. I hold different views on key topics to loads of my friends but we're still friends.
Without wanting to go on - 'The Church' you are portraying in your novel isn't necessarily the church your friends and family identify with, go to on a Sunday etc etc. It is a church but it doesn't have to be their church. Not sure if I am explaining this very well, haven't finished my morning coffee yet.
LL

Shiiuga
50568 words so far Winner!

Exactly, you could even call it 'The Church' and just make sure not to make too many allusions to Christianity (change the religious symbol and that sort of thing) and it would work quite well.

I had a similar idea for a novel where Scientology has slowly become the world's dominant religion and a group of people are fighting to bring the church of Scientology down.

Also the game Syndicate and its sequel Syndicate Wars got around the whole "The church is a massive cult that brainwashes people" thing nicely by simply calling it the Church of the New Epoch.

It's just good allegory!

nodgene

Shiiuga wrote:
I had a similar idea for a novel where Scientology has slowly become the world's dominant religion and a group of people are fighting to bring the church of Scientology down.

*shudders*

poysen
53089 words so far Winner!

I'm pretty sure there's a lot in most novels that someone somewhere would find offensive. However, when you get to religion people get even more touchy than usual. I, too, am dealing with a plot that could be viewed as sacreligious. That's not my intent, but I refuse to silence the story that came to me, so family will have a lot of questions and unsavory comments, I'm sure. No wonder it's taken 6 years to REALLY give this one a chance to be written.

oazan
50130 words so far Winner!

It's your story, so if it's too controversial for other people, warn them ahead of time. Tell them that if it offends them, they should put it down before they get too into it. A published book has the blurb on the back, and a reader has a chance to read it and decide if they like it. Give your friends and family the same option.

lurgee
50026 words so far Winner!

It's also worth pointing out there's a difference between attacking / mocking an institution and a faith. There's a million miles between what Jesus actually said, and what most churches decree. Read what is attributed to him in the sermon on the mount (Matthew 5,6,7). It's an astonishingly wise piece of writing, even if you're not a Christian of any sort. And utterly removed from the vainglorious, self important, judgemental and officious institutions that set themselves up in his name over the subsequent 2000 years. Jesus - whether or not he was the son of God - rocked. Churches - almost universally - suck.

mattkinsi
66417 words so far Winner!

Hi and welcome to the Religious Lit forum. We all need to be careful about absolute statements. Please use I statements.

Example-

"Jesus - whether or not he was the son of God - rocked. Churches - almost universally - suck." should be something more like "I believe that Jesus - whether or not he was the son of God - rocked and think that Churches - almost universally - suck."

There are no wrong ideas/opinions here, but you need to denote they are your ideas/opinions. If you want to get into a theological discussion/argument, this isn't the place for it. Hit up the Writing Clubs or the Off Topic forum. Thanks!

angitiger
50153 words so far Winner!

This Thread is going to be moved to here http://www.nanowrimo.org/en/forums/religious-spiritual-new-age

Thank you guys

Dragonchilde
9322 words so far

Moving to Religious

NateDavis1798
0 words so far

You shouldn't ask yourself if it's going to offend anyone. You should ask yourself if you care.

As far as I'm concerned, no subject is too controversial to confront or at least touch on. Don't censor yourself.

Cadaverine
50355 words so far Winner!

Have you played Final Fantasy X? In a way this reminds me of the church of Yu-Yevon.

Also you may find of some use the Advanced Bonewits Cult Danger Evaluation Frame.

psychoceramic
1541 words so far

If you write and you write well you will offend someone (most likely you will offend them quicker if you write poorly.)
My straight forward Christian novel will offend someone out there just as easily as your novel will, not because of what you wrote but because of what they believe. (Some might be offended by my story in the fact that the year is some where around 2400 and Jesus hasn't come back yet.)

Look at this thread.... it seems to have offender some already by the answers that were given, the topic itself and the beliefs of the posters.

Do not worry about it, just write and write well.
I also think that if you stick to the "god is real...church took over and made it evil..." then you have davinci code 2.

in Jesus,
psychoceramic

polargriff
6695 words so far

riddikulus-grin wrote:My story is set in a world where proof of God was found and "The Church" took over. However, it's going to turn out that they lied about their proof for power, and they're pretty evil. It's unlikely this will be published, but I will be giving it to friends and family, some of which are religious. Will this tread on any toes, would you say? Is it a bad thing if it does?


Perhaps to avoid some of your intended readers from being offend, you can preface it was "This is a work of fiction" or make sure the cover or title page as "a novel" on it somewhere. But, most importantly, this is your story and you should write what you want to write.

I am a Christian myself, and I think this is a fantastic story idea. After reading your novel's synopsis, it intrigues me, and I feel it has potential for being an engaging story. Even a cursory review of history demonstrates that, within many religions and off-shoots of various beliefs, philosophical, and ideological systems, there have been many who have used the guise of religion, humanitarian ideals, a pretense of goodwill, etc. to assume power and, with the resulting power and authority, have committed horrendous crimes against humanity. Even Hitler did not present himself originally as his true self but was heralded as the savior of an economically destitute Germany; it was only after he achieved absolute power that the truth began to be known. Writing a fiction story that brings some of these less appealing human inclinations to light as well as highlighting the main character's search for truth through questioning the status quo and her love for her little sister are makings of a great story.

IonaPeridot
100177 words so far Winner!

It probably depends on how conservative or open-minded your friends and family are. If you make it sound like all religion and everyone who follows any religion is automatically evil because of this one group that lied, some people will definitely be extremely offended. But if it's more about this one lying group who's in charge being a problem than every individual person or the religion as a whole, then friends and family--people who know and love you--would probably understand what you're going for and not throw a hissy fit about it. Since you're talking, here, about individual people whom you are personally aquainted with, rather than large scale publishing, maybe you could just show it to the ones you know can handle it? And if the others were upset that you didn't show them, you could just explain the situation, and they could decide if they still wanted to read it and risk being offended.
I'm a Christian, and it sounds like something I'd love to read, but I have lots of friends who would be shocked and horrified at the concept. I think it just all depends on what your friends and family are like, which you pobably know better than any of us here.
Good luck with it! Sounds like an awesome story.

lurgee
50026 words so far Winner!

I would have thought Christians would have been comfortable with the idea of a corrupt power seeking church perverting the truth they perceive in the Bible being exposed. They do that to themselves rather frequently - where do you think all these factions and different churches come from?

It isn't like you're disproving God, merely corruption among its nominal ahderents on Earth.

EFBQ
71459 words so far Winner!

The question you seem to be asking isn't "will I offend someone" (to which the answer is, and should be, yes, now get on with it", but rather "will I offend my family and friends, who I trust and respect enough to show my book to". It's a different question entirely.

Make it clear when you write this book that *they*, and the Church(es) they belong to, are not the corrupt institution you are describing. Make it clear that this particular denomination of Chiristianity has faced opposition from within the Christian community as well as from outside of it, and that the whole of the religion is not to blame... unless your *point* is that Christians should speak up more against their own when they go overboard. How do you want these people to react? Do you want them to think? To change their behaviors? Or just to enjoy a good read...?

cheyinka
57900 words so far Winner!

Quote:Make it clear when you write this book that *they*, and the Church(es) they belong to, are not the corrupt institution you are describing. Make it clear that this particular denomination of Chiristianity has faced opposition from within the Christian community as well as from outside of it, and that the whole of the religion is not to blame... unless your *point* is that Christians should speak up more against their own when they go overboard.


Exactly. No matter how delicately you handle corruption in a church institution, someone will be offended, whether it's "How dare you imply that any Christians anywhere are corrupt!" or "How dare you not accuse all Christians everywhere of being corrupt!" But if you'll be showing it to friends and family, you should think about what they think of corruption in real-world churches. I mean, maybe they think there are corrupt churches now, or even that their own is corrupt and needs fixing; they might enjoy reading about your protagonist(s) defeating a corrupt-to-the-point-of-evil Church. Maybe they think their church isn't corrupt, but most of the others are - maybe they'd appreciate a hint that "real Christians" are in just as much danger from the Evil Church as non-Christians.

But maybe you've got a friend who sees corruption in her own church and would take a reference, no matter how carefully done, as adding insult to injury. Or maybe you've got a family member who works for the local bishop and might think Evil Church Bureaucrat #73 was a badly-hidden reference to them personally.

I'd go ahead and write it however felt right - but when it came time to edit it, I'd look at how I described my antagonists and how I described my Evil Church, and if my Evil Masterminds were Pope Gerald and Supreme Overlord Annalisa, I might not show it to my uncle Gerald or to my cousin, Sr. Annalisa, O.P. (On the other hand, if Uncle Gerald would find it hilarious to imagine himself leading an Evil Church, pick him as one of your first readers!)

lurgee
50026 words so far Winner!

It would depend whether the opposition comes soley from athiests / agnostics, or from reformist Christians as well. If the former, it might come across as an anti-Christian tract. If the latter, it will probably read as critique of church corruption, not of faith itself.

Who's online

There are currently 5921 users online.